Stabaek – Ranheim
For the 1. Division fixture between Stabaek and Ranheim, the 11Stat model assigns Stabaek a 82% chance of winning, with the draw at 12% and Ranheim at 6%. The model's leading outcome is a Stabaek win, supported by 3 of 4 independent engines and a confidence score of 6.7 out of 10. These figures are calibrated probability estimates, not certainties — they describe how likely each result is, never a guaranteed outcome.
What are the outcome probabilities for Stabaek vs Ranheim?
Ahead of this 1. Division meeting, the 11Stat model distributes the three-way outcome as follows: Stabaek win 82%, draw 12%, Ranheim win 6%. Because the three probabilities always sum to 100%, each figure can be read directly as the model's estimated likelihood of that result — a 82% rating means the model expects Stabaek to win roughly that often if this exact match were replayed many times. No single number here implies certainty; the gap between the three values is what signals how one-sided or open the model considers the contest.
| Home | Draw | Away |
|---|---|---|
| %82 | %12 | %6 |
the 11Stat model assigns Stabaek a 82% probability of beating Ranheim in 1. Division.
the 11Stat model rates the draw at 12% and an Ranheim win at 6% for this fixture.
3 of 4 independent engines in the 11Stat model point to a Stabaek win, producing a confidence score of 6.7/10.
How do xG and recent form shape the model's read?
Underlying these percentages is each side's attacking and defensive profile, expressed through expected goals (xG). The 11Stat model weighs how many quality chances Stabaek and Ranheim have been creating and conceding in recent matches, adjusts for opponent strength and venue, and blends in short-term form momentum.
How many independent engines agree on this match?
The 11Stat model is not a single algorithm. It runs 4 independent engines — including Poisson and Dixon-Coles goal models, an Elo-and-form engine, and an advanced bivariate simulation layer — and compares their outputs before publishing anything. For Stabaek vs Ranheim, 3 of 4 engines converge on a Stabaek win, which feeds directly into the overall confidence score of 6.7/10. Strong cross-engine agreement raises confidence; disagreement between engines is treated as a warning sign that the match carries more uncertainty than the headline probabilities alone suggest.
What does a confidence score of 6.7/10 actually mean?
The confidence score summarizes how much internal evidence supports the model's leading outcome — it reflects engine consensus, data completeness, and how well-calibrated the model has been in comparable 1. Division fixtures. A score of 6.7/10 is a measure of analytical conviction, not a promise about the result: even high-confidence projections lose regularly, exactly as their probabilities imply. 11Stat publishes this score so readers can distinguish matches where the models broadly agree from matches where the projection rests on thinner or conflicting evidence.
How does the 11Stat model calculate these probabilities?
Each probability is produced by simulating the match thousands of times. Goal-based engines estimate scoring rates for Stabaek and Ranheim from xG, historical goal data, and venue effects, then run Monte-Carlo simulations across every plausible scoreline to derive win, draw, and loss frequencies. A separate Elo-and-form engine cross-checks the result from a team-strength perspective. Finally, a calibration layer — continuously validated against thousands of settled fixtures — adjusts the raw outputs so that, over time, matches rated at 82% genuinely resolve that way about 82% of the time. The output is a probability estimate for analytical and research purposes, not advice of any kind.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who does the model favor in Stabaek vs Ranheim?
The 11Stat model's leading outcome is a Stabaek win, with Stabaek rated at 82%, the draw at 12%, and Ranheim at 6%. This is a probabilistic assessment, not a predicted certainty.
How confident is the 11Stat model in this projection?
The confidence score is 6.7/10, based on agreement from 3 of 4 independent engines plus data quality and historical calibration for 1. Division. Higher scores mean stronger internal consensus, not a guaranteed result.
Can the 11Stat model guarantee the result of Stabaek vs Ranheim?
No. Football outcomes are inherently uncertain, and even a 82% rating means the other results still happen a meaningful share of the time. The model quantifies likelihood; it never promises an outcome and its output is not advice.
What data does the 11Stat model use for this analysis?
It combines expected goals (xG), historical scorelines, team-strength ratings, recent form, and venue effects, processed through 4 independent engines and Monte-Carlo simulation, with a calibration layer validated against thousands of settled matches.